Yet another school shooter cites evolution and natural selection8 Oct 2007 Update:
as the main reason for his rampage. One of the Columbine HS shooters
wore a t-shirt that said "Natural Selection," and now the Finnish school
shooter Pekka-Eric Auvinen wore a "Humanity Is Overrated"
shirt with English wording. In his prequel YouTube video, he said
"Evolution is both a theory and a fact, creationism is neither one,"
and some such. So basically one of Dawkins' disciples killed 8 students
in one hour, which is more than the total number of abortion doctors
killed since 1974 (atheists often blame those deaths on Christians,
but those who commit them are not Christian most of the time).
see Inside the mind of a killer, by David Catchpoole, Nov 2007.
Ynetnews.com reports that Abe Foxman of the Anti-Defamation1 Oct 2007 Update:
League (ADL), Malcom Hoenlein, Executive Vice Chairman of the
Conference of Presidents of Major American Organizations, and
London Times columnist Daniel Finkelstein, all blasted Dawkins
for his helping to mainstream "Judeophobic sentiments." Ynet
reported:Five years ago, Dawkins reportedly added his name to letter
calling for an academic boycott against Israelis, and was
quoted by the Guardian then as saying that he 'can no longer
in good conscience continue to cooperate with official Israeli
institutions, including universities.'
Now word comes from UK's Guardian that Dawkins buys into the
theory that Israel has disproportionate political power in the US,
and he wants to counter the political power of the Jews by having
atheists out themselves, and get out of the closet.
So it begins anew, predictably. This reminds me of the atheist and
evolutionist Marx who in the late 1800s was say that Christianity
was the opiate of the masses. Then Marx's schoolchildren took
power in Russia, and the 70 years of suffering of the Jews and
Christians and others began. In the end, 100 million died in the
Communist social experiment, and all that was learned was that
Communism doesn't work.
This confirms was I was saying in my earlier post (below), that
naturalists like Dawkins who are not reigned in my religion will
believe in anything. Today, he believes that the beleaguered Jews
have not too little, but too much political power, and that atheists
therefore should snap up more of the pie leaving thinner slices
for everyone else.
Where will Dawkins & Co. thoughts and political aspirations end?
and how much suffering will this entail for humanity? Only God knows.
Atheists arise: Dawkins spreads the A-word among America's unbelievers
http://books.guardian.co.uk/news/articles/0,,2180660,00.htmlIn an interview with the Guardian, he said: "When you think about how fantastically successful the Jewish lobby has been, though, in fact, they are less numerous I am told - religious Jews anyway - than atheists and [yet they] more or less monopolise American foreign policy as far as many people can see. So if atheists could achieve a small fraction of that influence, the world would be a better place."hat tip: Richard Dawkins: now [tilting] at a new windmill, October 1st, 2007
http://www.yourish.com/2007/10/01/3762
18 June 2007:
Why Dawkins and other atheists are so dangerous, by Yoel Natan
GK Chesteron said: "When people stop believing in God, they don't
believe in nothing -- they believe in anything." In the 19th and 20th
Centuries, atheists came to believe in evolution, eugenics,
euthanasia, communism, anti-Semitism, etc. They believed in one or
more or all of these ideas fervently enough to kill over them. That is
why the Black Book on Communism estimates Communists killed 100
million in the 70 years it ruled a large part of the planet.
When one believes in evolution, no value or little value is put on
human life, and there's no accountability to a higher being, so an
atheist needs to just believe in something just a little bit in order
to kill since the act of murder is taken so lightly by atheists. God's
prohibitions against killing and threats of hell are like a tall wall
to religious folks keeping them from killing, but what keeps atheists
from killing amounts to a mere speed bump.
Atheists comes to believe in so many ideas that sound rational but
lack truly scientific evidence because they don't really believe in
hearing debate from opposing sides. They don't want to listen to
Creationists, but want everyone to accept evolution as fact without
debate. Certainly, they don't want the government to fund research and
education that might support conclusions that go against evolution.
The latest atheist fad is that Global Warming is caused by humans and
will be catastrophic in less than a century. Everyone knows that they
never took the skeptics' views as being serious enough to argue over,
but everyone is supposed to be bawled over by the consensus view and
one-sided evidence as presented mostly by atheistic scientists. They
want us to accept Global Warming with little debate even though
accepting means allowing atheist scientists mainly to micro-manage
entire economies, and perhaps reduce the human population down from 7
billion to 2 billion or less--to a sustainable level by their
calculations. Heaven help us if atheists grab absolute power as did
Hitler, Stalin and Mao, because these dictators did not have such
"lofty" social engineering goals for humanity as do modern atheists.
When one believes in evolution, no value or little value is put on
human rights. Thus, while most countries in the past tried to control
population size through democratic means and education, atheistic
Communistic China has forced abortions under its One Child policy.
China is also quick to execute criminals, especially drug dealers, and
use slave labor in camps where conditions are so bad that life
expectancy is short. The criminals may be there just for preaching the
Gospel, a major crime according to atheists. Also, those who are
executed or die early have their organs sold on the Black Market.
Dawkins and his ilk have said that teaching religion to children is
child abuse. Now in 2007 a poll revealed another whacko idea that
atheists tend to subscribe to--just because they'll believe in
anything, as GK Chesteron said. Atheists like to hold the conceit that
"Christianity is just as threatening in America as is radical Islam."
Yes, that makes oh so much sense because as we all know, Christians
have killed and plotted to kill as many people as Muslims have these
last few years. One can see that anti-Christianism, which says that
Christians are potentially dangerous theocrats, is just the flip side
of the coin of Nazi anti-Semitism which taught that Jews were
dangerous to have around, a la the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
Another poll in 2007 revealed that atheistists are less likely to:
vote, vote for a mainstream political party when they do vote,
volunteer to help a non-church NPO, be active in the community, and
"to personally help or serve a homeless or poor person (41% versus
61%).
One can see why Dawkins and his ilk is so dangerous because with his
Blasphemy Challenge and his books, he creates many atheists who
"believe in anything." Unfortunately, what these atheists tend to
believe in is hardly innocuous for the rest of humanity, as history
shows. Moreover, atheists tend to be more heartless, and will not
readily help the homeless, more often than not preferring that natural
selection and survival of the fitness take their natural course.
------------
Atheists and Agnostics Take Aim at Christians
http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdateNarrow&BarnaUpdateID=272
One of the most significant differences between active-faith and
no-faith Americans is the cultural disengagement and sense of
independence exhibited by atheists and agnostics in many areas of
life. They are less likely than active-faith Americans to be
registered to vote (78% versus 89%), to volunteer to help a
non-church-related non-profit (20% versus 30%), to describe themselves
as "active in the community" (41% versus 68%), and to personally help
or serve a homeless or poor person (41% versus 61%). They are also
more likely to be registered to vote as an independent or with a
non-mainstream political party.
-----------------
Fitzgerald: A thought experiment for air travelers, 18 June 2007
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/016980.php
"Beyond the bestseller lists, however, a new survey shows there is
indeed a significant gap between Christians and those Americans who
are in the "no-faith" camp. For instance, most atheists and agnostics
(56%) agree with the idea that radical Christianity is just as
threatening in America as is radical Islam." -- from this news article
0 comments:
Post a Comment